top of page

Particle Progression

Particle Progression


*******************************


Affiliations:


U.S.Armed Forces-U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Grounds Machinist Training Center 2004


Acknowledgment:


I acknowledge the many members of the world for the efforts to understand and better the future as well as Aristotle, Newton, Pythagoras, Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, Brain Cox, James Grime, as well as those responsible for research data listed below.


Keywords:


Quantum Relativity, Velocity, Particle Progression, Momentum, Entropy, Gravity


Abstract:


In this article I propose revisions to some basic functions to facilitate and detail and inclusive construct of calculation to remove the inability to define as a whole physics before and after The Big Bang.


Introduction:


A basis to allow for the calculation of physics as it is before and after The Big Bang and provide a new understanding of the laws of physics and further the knowledge of humanity with this understanding. As we identify some concepts that currently prevent such logic and break down basic revisions to remove and enable such calculations to include and logically permit its use with mathematical logic.


Question One:


What formulas and current mathematical logic prevents or deters the ability to apply current physics to the before conditions of The Big Bang?


Question two:


What revision can we apply that would allow mathematical logic to calculate the before and after The Big Bang?


Research:


Research was conducted using an internet search to identify the use of formulas that derive conditions of time, velocity, gravity, momentum, entropy, particle physics. A vast majority of this was extracted various google searches under the above context and was detailed on a number of documents on basic physics. As a mechanical engineer the foreknowledge derived from military training and course work present during my service at U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Grounds Machinist Training Center. Many concepts where extracted from Aristotle, Newton, Pythagoras, Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, Brain Cox, James Grime.











Hypothesis:


That it is possible to create using mathematical logic a method to calculate, before and after The Big Bang.


Question One:


What formulas and current mathematical logic prevents or deters the ability to apply current physics to the before conditions of The Big Bang?


Answer To Question One:


The derived formulas that include conditions only usable for post Big Bang concepts are the issue. These formulas deter and inhibit and inclusion of mathematical logic that allows for the same calculations and mathematical logic to exist and be used for before and after this event.


The basic formulas I found that exist after an internet search that are conditionally including concepts of time, energy, velocity, momentum, matter, force, gravity, and entropy. This the answer is the foundations for which these specific formulas exist that is the issue.


The use of space-time conflicts with the ability to calculate using the same model of particle mechanics as defined by the emergence of energy. Thus this emergence permits the use of a construct called time to begin.


“The general view of physicists is that time started at a specific point about 13.8 billion years ago with the Big Bang, when the entire universe suddenly expanded out of an infinitely hot, infinitely dense singularity, a point where the laws of physics as we understand them simply break down. This can be considered the “birth” of the universe, and the beginning of time as we know it.”



Velocity uses the construct of acceleration but since acceleration is a result and not a source we must identify the source of velocity. The most direct condition of velocity is force. Be it the force applied at creation and such velocity is calculated based on the weight of its density by volume to produce the variable result of velocity and so the result is calculated as velocity as such.


As a condition of velocity the use of time is used and since before The Big Bang the use of time to include by mathematical logic cannot be applied to a particle that would exist before its emergence.


Momentum uses a result and not a source to be defined. As the density of its volume and acceleration produce the result of force in the absence of additional force relative to the environment to which it exists. This momentum is a derived result of applied force. As such the source must be used instead of the result.


Weight is using a result of gravitational force between separate particles regardless of volume by density we can observe these conditions between separate constructs and identify that both constructs include a form of attraction. This attraction is what creates the result of weight defined by that density and volume.


Entropy is a condition which in most cases disables the understanding of atomic flow, “often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness of the system.

"the second law of thermodynamics says that entropy always increases with time" and “lack of order or predictably; gradual decline into disorder.

"a marketplace where entropy reigns supreme".



Considering two main factors by use of time and disorder, we lose the ability to include this with a before The Big Bang calculation. We must maintain the conditions of order and the disuse of time. This also conflicts with by use of disorder or terms of chaos to obtain an absolute calculation. Such a formula made by Hawking’s includes the use of Entropy.


Energy as defined by Einstein uses a function that is not associated as a source, but is a result by use of Mass or Matter and also with the use of Energy. In regards to E=MC2 we see a use of the result of particles under a condition of higher density by volume and call this Mass or Matter. Since Mass or Matter uses this result it cannot be included until after such event occurs. As we backtrack through the creation process even energy because a result of force.


Even when considering string theory we come into a condition in which energy exists and as such it does not permit the existence of such strings without the use of energy and also cannot be used. In order to even define how strings come into existence one must be able to use the same particle model to define even the birth of strings.


Velocity

Momentum

Weight

Entropy

Energy


Question two:


What revision can we apply that would allow mathematical logic to calculate the before and after The Big Bang?


Answer To Question Two:


With the main formulas defined as conflicting with an inclusive definition and the mathematical logic of before and after the event the following revisions can be applied to remove concepts that disassociate this inclusive model and mathematical logic.


In reference to string theory it lacks the ability to define a state of existence without the use of energy and when presenting mathematical logic a particle model must be capable of defining a state of existence both before the existence of such energy as a lack thereof and with the existence of energy. It must be capable of being used regardless of how particle tension is defined and this requires a model that is expansive in this use and capable of being used in every form of logic that could exist. For even if we define it’s existence in a different way or using something other then string such as particle waves the model must be inclusive in such a manner that it can with or without such uses be presented even to define the birth of strings.


Tools:


Since a current particle model does not permit the conditions of mathematical expression using logic as is with consideration to time, weight, velocity, momentum, energy. A new form of model must be derived.


This model is called particle progression and is using a method of calculation that removes any mathematical shortcuts and reducing all calculations based on a positive and negative interaction and by association of categories of source and result. This model does not incorporate the use of time and instead uses a chronological statement of creation as a progressive factor as a step-by-step process used to identify a segment of existence for which decay had not yet existed. It holds no other limits. The following formulas where revised in application of such particle progression.


The use of particle progression is needed because the creation of space-time had not yet begun and the ability to define this interaction required a system of comparison for which to reference without decay using Force, Volume, and Density. To facilitate a direct model capable of mathematical logic before and after the existence of energy.



Velocity:


This is where we remove the use of the term time and place progression. This is to better represent the chronological order of creation by the use of P instead of T.



Momentum:


This is revised to express the proper result by application of force as a positive and negative interaction. Done so to identify the source and the resulting momentum of such volumes of density.


It should read as follows:


That momentum is the progressionary derivative of force.



Weight:


This is revised to better represent, and associate values of the particles as a dual function of progressive pull and tension between particles based on the density values to produce proper calculations and express why light is affected by gravity as well as tidal flow from the moon. By classifying properly electron residue to include sub atomic particles.



E=MC2


This revision is to properly associate the source material (Density) and exclude the result (Mass) based on its density and volume. As Mass or M is a result and the source is Density or D we identify that source based on the electron residue by density. Essentially we exclude the misconceptions of the sum by explicitly using the parts.



Entropy:


This is revised to explain what is considered as disorder or chaos as a progressional order by chronological statement of created using a 360 degree construct called Pi and is explicit for the definition of all particles and their perspective trajectory within a variable of Pi.





When you complete this and include each segment of revision you extract the results of quantum relativity. Where you can not only calculate the before and after The Big Bang using the same particle model of particle progression but properly define the quantum explosion itself.



Conclusion:


In consideration and objective view of the above formula revisions it is my conclusion that it is entirely possible to create an inclusive and mathematically logical model of calculation to define both before and after the event we call The Big Bang. Not only does this encompass a series of particles but can be applied to all particles regardless of what they are in any extreme conditions.


The particle model called particle progression allows for the ability to define quantum physics and even string theory by holding the ability to define the birth of strings themselves while also allowing for the mathematical logic to define any form of interaction between them and form of density by volume using positive and negative interactions by category of source and result. As the sources are identified and traced back to the origins, the source itself is defined by force. Thus we exist because force exists. As such all things that exist are a result of force and the source of all is force.


In order to make a particle model that includes the existence of all under one it must be capable of detailing all that exists and be capable of when all that exists did not exist. This is how we obtain the understanding of mathematical logic as an all inclusive model to detail everything that exists and using the same model to detail when it did not.


This model holds one downside as it would not incorporate mathematical logic to define an existence without a positive and negative such as positive only. Thus we define this condition as a void of null density where by only one conditional density resides as null. Under this we can extrapolate that in such a condition of null all was if even for a single moment one and without a comparison to determine a variable would effectively be today considered zero.


Under this condition of null if you compressed null by volume you would gain the effect of positive and negative by reducing a volume to create a alteration of its density. As the extreme of this condition persists to compress we obtain a notable source of force by expansion back to null from a compressed state where by force has compressed and then expanded to generate a condition of extreme force. By which from nothing we obtain something. Since this model is capable of detailing the force from a void and variant of such density it persists to allow and include an existence of such with and without the use of particle energy, tension, momentum, weight, velocity, strings, matter regardless of what they are or how they interact and even how they are created.


A further extrapolation of variants particle progression allows is density to density and also volume to volume, if the density to density is different it persists as a variant of comparison and thus identified, if volume to volume is different this also defines a comparison between each and also persists. As such under mathematical logic the conditions in which it cannot define is when all conditions are exactly the same density and no volume exists. It is my understanding this void of null density is where of like coagulation occurs and force is first applied giving rise to variants even through the interlocking force within force itself.


Even in reference to Nikola Tesla in depiction of energy as a vibration and frequency, these are results and conditions of measurement by which the source of interlocked force resides within a determined space with a specific density. If we referred to the atomic particle and define the reference of how these frequency and vibrations are created we would perceive a battery as the Protons are positively charged particles, neutrons are uncharged(negative) particles with orbital atomic particles as electrons and this would identify closely as a back emf switch at the sub atomic level producing the frequency and vibration through electron orbits which we measure as by the speed for which the orbits occur as the energy created defines vibrational frequency. Conditionally verified by super cooling the system and observing the modifications. This interlocked force defines how strings are created and other binding forms through the electron residue though considering the conditions of electron residue calling them strings is still a representation of a result and not the source. Even calling them strings is a bit of a stretch, as electron residue interactions resemble more like Wi-Fi where is connects in a radius of the field to all of like particles. While these fields are compose of particles they could be presented as a sort of string but it would not be defined as a single string but a vast number up to Any number defined by the capacity of the source energy. Just as lightning is made up of many particles so too is the string.





Holographic 5D Anti de Sitter Space-Time


This is a synopsis of the above link to a 1-3-19 Quanta Magazine article titled “How space and time could be a quantum error correcting code.” The article starts with the history of correcting 'bit flips' of 0's and 1's in quantum computing. “Physicists believe gravity must have a deeper, quantum origin from which the semblance of a space-time fabric somehow emerges. That year — 2014 — three young quantum gravity researchers came to an astonishing realization. They were working in physicists’ theoretical playground of choice: a toy universe called “anti-de Sitter space” that works like a hologram. The bendy fabric of space-time in the interior of the universe is a projection that emerges from entangled quantum particles living on its outer boundary. Ahmed Almheiri, Xi Dong and Daniel Harlow did calculations suggesting that this holographic “emergence” of space-time works just like a quantum error-correcting code. They conjectured in the Journal of High Energy Physics that space-time itself is a code — in anti-de Sitter (AdS) universes, at least. The paper has triggered a wave of activity in the quantum gravity community, and new quantum error-correcting codes have been discovered that capture more properties of space-time.


As a simple example, consider the three-qubit code: It uses three “physical” qubits to protect a single “logical” qubit of information against bit-flips. (The code isn’t really useful for quantum error correction because it can’t protect against phase-flips, but it’s nonetheless instructive.) The |0⟩ state of the logical qubit corresponds to all three physical qubits being in their |0⟩ states, and the |1⟩ state corresponds to all three being |1⟩’s. The system is in a “superposition” of these states, designated |000⟩ + |111⟩. But say one of the qubits bit-flips. How do we detect and correct the error without directly measuring any of the qubits?

The qubits can be fed through two gates in a quantum circuit. One gate checks the “parity” of the first and second physical qubit — whether they’re the same or different — and the other gate checks the parity of the first and third. When there’s no error (meaning the qubits are in the state |000⟩ + |111⟩), the parity-measuring gates determine that both the first and second and the first and third qubits are always the same. However, if the first qubit accidentally bit-flips, producing the state |100⟩ + |011⟩, the gates detect a difference in both of the pairs. For a bit-flip of the second qubit, yielding |010⟩ + |101⟩, the parity-measuring gates detect that the first and second qubits are different and first and third are the same, and if the third qubit flips, the gates indicate: same, different. These unique outcomes reveal which corrective surgery, if any, needs to be performed — an operation that flips back the first, second or third physical qubit without collapsing the logical qubit. “Quantum error correction, to me, it’s like magic,” Almheiri said.”

AdS Explanation: The paper goes on to explain that “It’s important to note that AdS space is different from the space-time geometry of our “de Sitter” universe. Our universe is infused with positive vacuum energy that causes it to expand without bound, while anti-de Sitter space has negative vacuum energy, which gives it the hyperbolic geometry of one of M.C. Escher’s Circle Limit designs. Escher’s tessellated creatures become smaller and smaller moving outward from the circle’s center, eventually vanishing at the perimeter; similarly, the spatial dimension radiating away from the center of AdS space gradually shrinks and eventually disappears, establishing the universe’s outer boundary. AdS space gained popularity among quantum gravity theorists in 1997 after the renowned physicist Juan Maldacena discovered that the bendy space-time fabric in its interior is “holographically dual” to a quantum theory of particles living on the lower-dimensional, gravity-free boundary.” Which just ‘holographically’ confirms that that Negative Energy that kept the tunnel between the two ends of the wormhole open in the 3rd section was Also in AdS's 5th Dimension Distinct from the Positive Repulsive 55-Graviscalar Dark Energy representing 68.169% of the Conserved Universal Mass!!


In reference to a system structure in the above representation.


Use of qubit functions by non value it still intertwined with the positive and negative interactions under particle progression. Though there is a concept that is not being addressed properly with this mention and this is explained by the electron residue present in all forms. Consider the reality of density by volume, it’s associated with all forms of matter, light being an extremely lower amount of density, as it exhibits reflection, refraction, absorption, capacity, photosynthesis, conversion ratios, these are all variables of the preset conditions of matter by volume based on density. The purpose of particle progression is to establish a mathematical logic to define and calculate an existence with and without the presence of energy, particle progression would even supersede this above mentioned quantum function because it can be used to define its creation. The sole purpose of particle progression is to provide a method to define all other methods, functions and results and without them. Though a mention of negative energy exist, it is more prominent to refer to the (-) function as nearest in terms of creation by the lack of positive. Though when referencing particle progression it includes a use of both. If we assume the qubit function is true. This would function as one base and 2 orbits of positive and negative or by atleast one highly positive and one low positive in which a energy flow occurs back and forth through the base, thus creating a vibration and frequency of measurement. These functions if considered true would most likely be 100,000s of time smaller then size of even a quark, they would be interlocked force which is force inside of force, this force is a density by volume of the electron residue which permits it to be influenced but the mass of collective particles. The moon and earth are prime examples of this. But in reference to the qubit system it would be more likely that it is a structure with far more orbital particles then just a few. But the interior of the very smallest of smallest structures would be represented by a 3 part system. Regardless of the number of actual orbital particles it would need a reservoir and 1 highly charged and 1 low charged to represent and produce a sub atomic back emf condition maintain and creating a result we could measure using the results of the energy system as frequency of its vibrations based on the speed of orbit which would be the pulse. I suppose it could be construed as a stable source to begin from but I would not refer to it as a holographic system. It is literally electron residue by density and volume.


The use of 000 - 111 and its variables could trace the pathway of the charge bouncing around the sub atomic particle.


Example

100 - 011 would be a state by which the charge has bounced to the lower positive (negative)

010 - 101 could reference the state of movement of that charge.

001 -110 further movement to the charge as the duality pull occurs in the particles, the current is interacting within the system.

000 - 111 is a fully transitioned charge to the right by witch is returns in refraction to the lower charged state (negative)

001 - 110 movement in duality charge now leaving the positive into the negative

011 - 100 as it refracts into the lower charge the once negative becomes the lower charge (negative)

100 - 110 begins again as the lower charge refracts and the lesser charge is altered by refraction of energy


Ping Pong atomic energy. As the lesser charged side flip flops as the current bounces back and forth.


It would make sense that there would need to be far more then just a 000 - 111 system to accurately define quantum.


Considering the the maximum number retained within this atomic particle would be by position PI there would be a requirement of


Pi - Pi


So it would require 4th dimensional calculus on a spectrum of Pi. Where by the number of 0s to 1s would represent the a change of position and refraction of energy between them.


M to D and T to P

Where M is Mass

Where D is Density

Where T is Time

Where P is Progression


-quickreference


M is to D as T is to P, we all fly free when we use density.

Recent Posts

See All

Order of Operation

Order of Operation according to a web search was first used in aprox 16th century. Let's begin: What is Order of Operation? The convention that multiplication precedes addition and subtraction was in

Wonders of the Future

Wonders of the Future: The reality of true solutions and the wonder and beauty of those solutions. Created correctly and provided in proper form the wealthy can still have their status, people can sti

Perpetual Motion Exists

What by definition of a human is perpetual motion? per·pet·u·al mo·tion /pərˈpeCH(əw)əl ˈmōSH(ə)n/ noun a state in which movement or action is or appears to be continuous and unceasing."the planet is

Comments


AllForYou@2020 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
bottom of page