The newborn baby only able to take one breath (or none at all receiving oxygen in the womb). In your heart you say it is "Gods Will" but according to the rules you use against others this baby is doomed. The baby unable to know the bible gets to go to hell. But you then say no "God keeps your baby in heaven" for it is innocent. The fact is you need to understand God and to seat with God is not defined upon time. It is defined upon morality and intent. Neither of which would send the Baby to hell. So I say this. God learns, and you will too.
Pro Life?
When a 14 year old child is raped and forced to give birth God will ask the child to view it's self through the sub conscious and show both sides of that coin, the left and the right and allow the child's mind to make a choice. Science gives God an opportunity to prevent even that choice from causing immorality upon the child. Should the child choose not to give pro life to the infant due to the immorality for which it was implanted to be un-consenting, without free will and without the love of the host as a attack on the energy of the body to devour and consume to live and grow. That child shall not be held accountable for science can choose to hold that egg and freeze it so God may educate the immorality within it for a year before it may be considered available for implant. Should the choice be to not allow a frozen embryo to continue. This is where God says I shall save that soul myself. I absolve you CHILD go forth. We will place these embryo's in stasis and generate conditions of morality. Music being played while in stasis and sounds of nature at peace. No words may be used of human decent.
But know you need to control yourself, use birth control so this does not happen. Use condoms so I don't have too do that. Control yourself so I don't have too. It is not a joke. The end of the genetic line should never be allowed. To prevent this storage of genetic structures of sperm may be needed. God Bless. God saved your children now stop screwing it up. Thank you.
Forced Pro Life?
Allow me to elaborate, a man age 43 stalks kidnaps and repeatedly rapes a 14 year old girl for the purpose of getting her pregnant and having his child. Now explain to me the morality of what you just told me and how that morality allows you to dictate her choice?
Though I understand the life is sacred and I understand that though it should be pro life but not forced pro life and yes perhaps the church could offer it but ultimately it is literally that lifeforms decision to accept the immorality of that individuals conception, the resulting immorality that comes from forcing a pro life decision will result in even greater immorality to those who have become subjected to it. The choices of that decision to force life upon another is the wearer of that immorality. God is not petty nor is God ignorant. For all you know child birth may have killed that child. Even if not at birth later on as suicide and depression coinciding with just self reflection. While she may in fact survive the birth the knowledge and experience of that entire event ending in her being forced to give not only her body as this mans fetus farm and sex toy but to you because you think you have the right to do so.
When we force pro life, you open another door to undocumented, unregulated, unrestricted, medical practice and tools to cause this effect. To include physical violence, genital mutilation, overdose, suicide when you do this you end up with abortions and people using hangers to do it on their kitchen tables. While we should urge pro life, and provide education and contraception we do not control free will.
I feel the sanctity of each life is also precious and would encourage pro life choices but not at the expense of ones morality. On the topic of frozen embryos, if this could be removed from the young lady and then given to adoption as a alternative to abortion it would still remain the child's choice.
The result of forcing pro life will define that others for moral and legal reason can then command you to give birth against your will which is by far a violation of human rights. Sanctity of life from the intent of the child being born is just to live. There is always immorality present when you begin with immorality, the intent of the child raped was not to give consent for life or love. While you stand here saying all life is sanctified that implies the two involved are consenting educated people of adult age and understanding. While this works well remember that there is a problem when the above scenario unfolds and it is no longer anyone else's place to enforce a choice through let's say, tie her down to a bed and telling her she will go to jail or hell if she does otherwise. You then become an attacker and have effectively commanded this woman to have a baby at your command.
Essentially forcing pro life while holding a bible is literally hypocrisy as your essentially saying I only support sanctity of human life as I devour the rest like the animals who are also Gods children. So check yourself. You don't even understand the immorality of eating yet. God does cherish life yes but not at the cost of yours and more especially not without your free will. The church will remain adamant about pro life choices without the use of damnation as a threat. The understanding of morality and sanctity of life is critical but these understandings include thought, intent, desire, emotions, morality, love, truth, reality. While we strive to refine ourselves we endeavor to achieve this sanctity and purity through morality, we do not command.
